Open to new projects

Send a quick note.

Hiring, or an account that needs better results. A couple of lines is enough; I reply within a working day.

I only use your details to reply. Privacy notice

Paid social · Fast food · Pakistan, national

Cheezious: a 36.88 ROAS on Meta ads for a national fast food brand

A national fast food brand in Pakistan running only awareness and engagement on Meta, with no sales campaigns and no tracking. How I set up the tracking, introduced sales campaigns and scaled the monthly budget to a 36.88 average ROAS.

Client
Cheezious
Platform
Meta ads (Facebook and Instagram)
Role
Digital Marketing Manager, Ben Da'ood Studios
Period
2023 to 2024
  • 01 36.88 Average ROAS across campaigns
  • 02 46.43 ROAS on the strongest campaign
  • 03 40.96 ROAS on the second-strongest campaign
  • 04 −76% Cost per purchase vs Meta peers, best ad sets

The brief

Cheezious is one of the best-known fast food brands in Pakistan. When I took the account on at Ben Da'ood Studios, Meta was being used only for awareness and engagement. There were no sales campaigns at all, the monthly budget was small, and nothing was tracking purchases: no GA4, no Tag Manager and no properly configured pixel. So there was no ROAS to report, because there was nothing measuring what the ads sold. The job was to change what the account was for: from being seen to selling.

What I did

Tracking first. GA4, Google Tag Manager and the Meta Pixel were set up from scratch, with purchase, add-to-cart and checkout events and the event priorities in the right order, and purchases tested order by order. The tracking side is written up separately in the Cheezious tracking case study.

Introduced sales campaigns. With purchases being recorded, I launched the account's first sales campaigns, optimised for purchases rather than engagement, alongside the awareness work the brand still needed.

Built the audiences. Segmented by past engagement and purchase behaviour, then split by demographic and location, so each ad set spoke to people with a reason to order rather than a broad interest audience.

Tested creative properly. Several versions of visuals and calls to action ran against each other every cycle. The winners were scaled across ad sets; the rest were switched off.

Scaled the budget as the return held. ROAS decided where the money went. Spend moved toward the ad sets producing revenue, and the monthly budget went up month by month as the sales campaigns proved themselves.

Results

Across the sales campaigns the account averaged a 36.88 ROAS, with the strongest campaign at 46.43 and another at 40.96. On the best-performing ad sets, Meta's own peer comparison put cost per website purchase 76% below similar advertisers and cost per engagement 74% below.

In short

An account that was only buying reach and engagement became one that sold: tracking first, then sales campaigns, better audiences and tested creative, with the monthly budget scaled as the return held. The result was a 36.88 average ROAS.

From Ads ManagerScreenshots from Meta Ads Manager, resized. Amount spent hidden. Tap a screenshot to open it full size.
More work

Other case studies

All work →

Most of my week is spent inside client accounts, so case studies get written up when there's a gap between campaigns. More are on the way. If you want figures from an account or platform that isn't here yet, ask and I'll pull them from the account.